Legal Opinion

Arlington Heights Appliance Co. v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1951No. 15299PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENFRO, Justice.

The Arlington Heights Appliance Company, appellant, brought suit against Sam Gordon and W. E. Pope, appellees, for the possession of two television sets. From a summary judgment in favor of appellees, appellant prosecutes this appeal.

The appellant alleged that appellees came into possession of the television sets through a thief, one Vincent, who had procured the sets 'by means of false pretense and that appellees had entered into a conspiracy with Vincent to gain possession of the sets through fraud.

Appellant presents seven points of error. They all allege error on the part…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. De La Garza v. RyalsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Fonville v. Southern Materials Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Clark v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Higginbotham-Bartlett Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sparkman v. McWhirterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Statham v. City of TylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Pate v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Edwards v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Goldman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API