Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1905No. L.A. No. 1307PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been caused to certain land and premises of plaintiff by the construction and maintenance by defendant of a steam railroad along the public road or street upon which plaintiff’s land abuts. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $350, and a judgment was rendered accordingly. Defendant appeals from the judgment, and brings up the evidence and rulings of the court in a bill of exceptions.

The main facts are these: Wallace Avenue is a public highway in Santa Barbara County. It runs through the town of Summerland, and that part…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lane v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McCandless v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Montgomery & Mullen Lumber Co. v. QuimbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API