Legal Opinion
Harden v. Raffensperger
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 17, 1995No. 94-2892PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
65 F.3d 1392
64 USLW 2203, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,869
Naomi O. HARDEN, Antonia Mucci, Concetta Mucci, Ward O.
Hughes, Jr., and Evelyn M. Hughes, for themselves and on
behalf of all other similarly situated noteholders of
Firstmark Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
RAFFENSPERGER, HUGHES & CO., INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-2892.
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
Argued Dec. 5, 1994.*
Decided Sept. 15, 1995.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1995.
Gene R. Leeuw, Charleyne Gabriel (argued), Klineman, Rose & Wolf, Indianapolis, IN, for Naomi O. Harden, James G. Harden, Antonia Mucci, Concetta…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Livid Holdings Ltd. v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Refco, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- United States v. Edward L. Morris and Steven M. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Livid Holdings Ltd v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.