Legal Opinion

Weber v. Heitkamp (In Re Hopson)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided January 18, 2005No. 19-31103PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WERLEIN, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158, Appellant William D. Weber, former bankruptcy counsel for Debtors Tina and Kenneth Hopson (hereafter referred to as Debtors), appeals the April 30, 2004 Order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas denying his Motion to Modify the Confirmed Chapter 13 Plan. After having carefully reviewed the record and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the Bankruptcy Court’s April 30, 2004, Order should be REVERSED and VACATED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings.

I. Procedural History

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Barbosa v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanchez v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Sanchez)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API