Legal Opinion

Eads v. State Industrial Insurance System

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1993No. 23566PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant David Eads was injured at work and received a nineteen percent lump sum permanent partial disability (PPD) award. Eads’ case was eventually reopened and Eads received an additional sixteen percent PPD award which the appeals officer determined could be taken by Eads in either a lump sum or installments. The State Industrial Insurance System (SIIS) petitioned for judicial review, contending that the appeals officer violated NRS 616.607(l)(c) in allowing Eads to accept PPD awards totalling in excess of twenty-five percent in lump sum payments. The district court agreed and we…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American International Vacations v. MacBrideNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nevada Industrial Commission v. PeckNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State Industrial Insurance System v. KhweissNevada Supreme Court · 1992

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Reno v. YturbideNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State Industrial Insurance System v. PrewittNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. CITY OF RENO VS. YTURBIDENevada Supreme Court · 2019
  4. CITY OF RENO VS. YTURBIDENevada Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API