Legal Opinion
In Re Hillery
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1962No. Crim. 40PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Booker T. Hillery alleges that he is detained and confined by the Sheriff of the County of Kings; that he is not presently charged by complaint, indictment or information with any crime, but that he has been told by deputies in the sheriff’s office that he was being held on suspicion of the commission of a crime; that he has not been taken before a magistrate pursuant to the requirements of section 825 of the Penal Code ; that he has been prevented from talking with his attorney; that he is on parole for a former crime and that his parole…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re BrowningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- In Re BranhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by48 opinions
- Anthony (Tony) Gaston v. Anna Ramirez PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Robinson v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- In Re MuszalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.