Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Rose
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided July 21, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
S. Samuel Di Falco, S.
The executors and the Billy Bose Foundation, Inc., named as respondents in a proceeding brought to construe the decedent’s will, have moved for an order summarily dismissing the construction proceeding adjudging that the gifts to the Billy Bose Foundation, Inc. are valid and that the distributees have no interest in the estate beyond the provisions made for them in the decedent’s will. The separate motions by these respondents are supported by the same affidavits and documents and will therefore be treated as one motion.
The paragraphs of the will which contain the seeds…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Edwards v. SlocumSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Tilden v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- In Re Proving the Will of MountNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- In Re the Probate of the Will of RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the State of CarmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In Re the Estate of WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re the Estate of DimetNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973