Legal Opinion

Quan v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1989No. 77527PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant Quan’s motion for summary judgment regarding appellee Johnson’s theory of liability based on the family purpose doctrine, as alleged in Johnson’s personal injury action against Quan and her brother Pak Uyu Hui. Hui was driving and Quan was riding in a 1983 Oldsmobile when it collided with Johnson’s vehicle, injuring Johnson. Johnson sued Quan, the registered owner of the Oldsmobile, under the family purpose doctrine. After discovery, Quan moved for summary judgment, but the trial court denied her motion. We granted her application…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Murch v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Quattlebaum v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Keith v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whitley v. DittaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Walston v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Bailey v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Smith v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Smith v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API