M.Z. Berger & Co., Inc. v. Swatch Ag
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHEN, Circuit Judge.
M.Z. Berger & Co., Inc. (Berger) appeals from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) decision to sustain an opposition on grounds that Berger, at the time of its application for the mark “iWatch,” lacked a bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce under Section 1(b)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051(b)(1). See Swatch AG v. M.Z. Berger & Co., 108 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1463 (T.T.A.B.2013) (Opinion). The Board concluded that Berger merely intended to reserve a right in the mark and thus lacked the requisite intent. Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- In Re Pacer TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- RXD Media, LLC v. IP Application Development LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Kelly Services, Inc. v. Creative Harbor, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Tiger Lily Ventures Ltd. v. Barclays Capital Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- RXD Media, LLC v. Ip Application Dev.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
- United States District Court Southern District v. GreesonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.