Legal Opinion

M.Z. Berger & Co., Inc. v. Swatch Ag

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 4, 2015No. 2014-1219PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHEN, Circuit Judge.

M.Z. Berger & Co., Inc. (Berger) appeals from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) decision to sustain an opposition on grounds that Berger, at the time of its application for the mark “iWatch,” lacked a bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce under Section 1(b)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051(b)(1). See Swatch AG v. M.Z. Berger & Co., 108 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1463 (T.T.A.B.2013) (Opinion). The Board concluded that Berger merely intended to reserve a right in the mark and thus lacked the requisite intent. Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  5. In Re Pacer TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. RXD Media, LLC v. IP Application Development LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  2. Kelly Services, Inc. v. Creative Harbor, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Tiger Lily Ventures Ltd. v. Barclays Capital Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  4. RXD Media, LLC v. Ip Application Dev.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
  5. United States District Court Southern District v. GreesonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API