Legal Opinion
Strother v. Mangham
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided December 13, 1915No. 21436PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from Eleventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Red River; W. T. Cunningham, Judge. Action by Andrew Strother against A. F. Mangham. ■ From judgment for defendant ■plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, C. J.
Plaintiff alleges that he executed an instrument in writing, which was duly recorded, and reads, in part, as follows:
“Be it remembered that, on this, 16th day of August, 1913, before me, S. M. Cagle, a notary public, * * * personally came and appeared Andrew Strother, * * * who stated and declared unto ,me, said notary, that he does, by these presents, grant, bargain, sell, convey and deliver all the oil,.gas and (?) under the following described land, together with the right of ingress and egress, at all times, for the purpose of drilling, mining and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Queensborough Land Co. v. CazeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Rives v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Losecco v. GregorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
3Cited by16 opinions
- Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Salling's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Hanby v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- De Moss v. SampleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Shaw v. WatsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Liles v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.