Legal Opinion

Heath v. Maddock

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 16, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Magie.

For affirmance — Garrison, Trenchaed, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenbuegh, Williams — 7.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Heppenheimer — 5.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phraner v. StoneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  2. Parker v. WrightNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  3. Henney v. ErtlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Tichenor v. Mech. Metals Nat. Bk. of N.Y.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  5. Lockwood v. ClarkeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API