Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 8, 1997PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

COLLESTER, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

In these appeals, consolidated for purposes of this opinion, defendants urge the following arguments on appeal:

I. The trial court erred in denying the motion for discovery under State v. Kennedy.

II. The trial court erred in denying the defendants’ motion to suppress physical evidence and statements.

III. The trial court should have enforced the original plea offer.

*375IV. The plea allocution provided insufficient notice as to the consequences of their pleas.

At 9:15 in the evening of January 14, 1994 Brian Smith and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Freeman v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  5. MAG v. Division of ABCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API