Legal Opinion

Groh v. Groh

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion to vacate a judgment of divorce.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The plaintiff, John Groh, obtained a judgment of absolute divorce against the defendant, Susie O. Groh, in February, 1899. In March, 1900, the plaintiff died. The defendant now,' after the lapse of more than a year from the death of plaintiff, makes a motion to set aside the judgment of divorce on the ground that said judgment was improperly obtained. I do not think this is the proper method of procedure. It seems to me, upon the authority of Watson v. Watson, 1 Hun, 267, that a separate action should have been brought against all the heirs and other persons interested in the real estate left…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cohen v. RandallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Cook v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hunt v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Morey v. MoreyNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Hunt v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API