Legal Opinion

Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Baillio

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1967No. 2739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNETTE, Judge.

This case is before us on two motions to dismiss a devolutive appeal. The first mo*140tion to dismiss is based upon the alleged failure of appellant to appeal within 90 days of the delay allowed for timely filing of a motion for new trial, as required by Article 2087 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The second motion to dismiss is based upon appellant’s alleged failure to pay the costs of court as required by law for lodging the appeal. The case was submitted after argument and the filing of briefs on these motions.

A review of the record before us, however, discloses that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. CampbellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  2. General Motors Accept. Corp. v. Deep South Pest Con.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Land v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Deep South Pest Control, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Kirkeby-Natus Corp. v. CampbellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fruehauf Trailer Company v. BaillioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. Allied Nav. Co., Inc. v. INTERN. ORG. OF MASTERS, MATES & PILOTSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Loyacano v. LoyacanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. LeMoine v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API