Legal Opinion
In Re King
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 11, 1984No. Bankruptcy 2-83-01789PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON OBJECTION TO CLAIM
G.L. PETTIGREW, Bankruptcy Judge.
The matter before the Court is the debt- or’s objection to the claim of Haffelt Bros. Custom Carpet, Inc. For the reasons set out below, the Court finds that Haffelt Bros, has not provided sufficient documentation of its secured status and must, therefore, be classified as unsecured.
The underlying claim of Haffelt Bros, arose from a contract obligating it to install certain carpeting in the debtor’s residence. This job was apparently completed in a timely and workmanlike manner. The debtor failed to pay for the carpet or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mahoning Park Co. v. Warren Home Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
- N. A. A. C. P. Credit Union v. Louie (In re Louie)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- M. J. Kelly Co. v. HaendigesOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- John F. Bushelman Co. v. TroxellOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Ulmer v. Portage Construction & Finance Co.Summit County Court of Common Pleas · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re RayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- Chaffin v. Gladney (In re Chaffin)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001