Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Campbell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 10, 1960PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Commissioner.
This suit was brought by three business partners against the executrix and heirs of a deceased partner to have the rights of the parties declared in the settlement of partnership interests. Since the controversy arose prior to 1954, the Uniform Partnership Act (KRS 362.150 — 362.360) is not applicable. The Chancellor decided all questions favorably to plaintiff appel-lees.
Upon appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal as to certain parties not named in the notice of appeal (CR 73.03), we have heretofore entered an order (dated October 21, 1958) limiting this appeal to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dalton v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Johnson v. . HartshorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- B. Perini & Sons, Inc. v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Stephens v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Van Hooser v. KeenonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Nucor Corp. v. General Electric Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Ventas, Inc. v. HCP, INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Estate of BolingerMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Ford Contracting, Inc. v. Kentucky Transportation CabinetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
- University of Louisville v. RAM Engineering & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.