White v. Young
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The order of the court of common pleas, dismissing the defendant’s objection to equity’s jurisdiction of the subject matter on the ground that there is a complete and adequate remedy at law, did not raise a question of jurisdiction appealable under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 PS §672 et seq. See Korona v. Bensalem Township, 385 Pa. 283, 284, 122 A. 2d 688. The appeal should therefore have been dismissed.
The order of the Superior Court is vacated and the appeal from the court of common pleas dismissed at appellant’s costs.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Korona v. Bensalem TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
3Cited by20 opinions
- Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Studio Theaters, Inc. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Dozor Agency v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- White v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Kramer v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.