Legal Opinion

White v. Young

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1960No. Appeal, 185PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court of common pleas, dismissing the defendant’s objection to equity’s jurisdiction of the subject matter on the ground that there is a complete and adequate remedy at law, did not raise a question of jurisdiction appealable under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 PS §672 et seq. See Korona v. Bensalem Township, 385 Pa. 283, 284, 122 A. 2d 688. The appeal should therefore have been dismissed.

The order of the Superior Court is vacated and the appeal from the court of common pleas dismissed at appellant’s costs.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Korona v. Bensalem TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Studio Theaters, Inc. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Dozor Agency v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. White v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Kramer v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API