Legal Opinion

Green v. City of St. Petersburg

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 11, 1944PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRELL, J.:

The City of St. ■ Petersburg owns and operates Mound Park Hospital. It is operated on a self supporting plan but all deficits in administration are paid from municipal funds. T. H. Green, a resident physician and taxpayer and member of the general staff of the hospital is permitted full use of its facilities for all purposes except the performance of major operations.

He made application for appointment to the associate surgical staff which would give him unrestricted use of the facilities of the hospital for all purposes but being refused this request, he made demand on the City…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayman v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Harris v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Richardson v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. City of Miami v. OatesSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Doctor Robert Sosa v. Board of Managers of the Val Verde Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. People v. BarksdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. North Broward Hospital District v. MizellSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  4. Findlay v. Board of Sup'rs of County of MohaveArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. West Coast Hospital Ass'n v. HoareSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API