Legal Opinion

City of Oakland v. Oakland Raiders

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1988No. A040245PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that in determining the amount of reasonable attorney fees in an eminent domain action, the trial court was not restricted to multiplying the number of hours of professional legal services rendered by the hourly rates charged by top law firms. The court, in exercising its discretion, could consider additional factors including the unusual character and difficulty of the litigation, the result achieved, the urgent time demands required by the litigation, its critical importance to the prevailing party and the financial burden of delay between incurring the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. City of Oakland v. Oakland RaidersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. Nobuo OtsukaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Flannery v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API