Legal Opinion

Holden v. Clancy

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

THIS is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment rendered against them on the report of a referee. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Talcott, J.

The facts in this case are substantially as follows. In October, 1866, the plaintiffs and defendants entered into a contract, in writing, by which the defendants agreed to rent to the plaintiffs a cattle barn, connected with the defendants’ distillery, till May 1, 1867, and also agreed to furnish to the plaintiffs, at the said barn, slops from their said distillery, one hundred and eighty-three bushels of slops per diem, during the term, and the plaintiffs agreed to pay for the slops and the rent of the barn, at the rate of nine cents per bushel of the slops…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reed v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Hoe v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Howard & Ryckman v. HoeyNew York Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seeberger v. CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Lukens v. FreiundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Buffelen Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API