Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Fulton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1844Published

Appeal from the District Court of Bast Baton Rouge, Johnson, J. cited, 5 Mart. N. S. 257. 1 La. 522. 17 La. 295. 11 La. 557. cited Civ. Code, arts. 2371, 2373, 2402. 11 La. 534-7. Campbell v. His Creditors, 3 Rob. 106. Davidson v. Stuart et al. 10 La. 148. De Blanc v. De Blanc., 4 La. 419.

1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.

The petitioner having recovered against the defendant, her husband, a judgment for $900, in an action for a separation of property, took a rule on the Sheriff of the parish of Bast Baton Rouge and the Bank of Louisana, to show cause why a sum of $488 56, in the hands of that officer, should not be paid over to her in preference to the Bank, which had levied an exe*74cution thereon, on the 16th of December, 1841. This money was a balance of the proceeds of a house and lot belonging to the defendant, which had been sold under a fieri facias issued on a twelve months’ bond, at the suit of one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. His CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  2. Bertie v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API