Legal Opinion
CONTRERAS
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1981No. ID 2859PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2869 MATTER OF CONTRERAS In Exclusion Proceedings A-36631574 Decided by Board March 20, 1981 (1) An absence by a lawful permanent resident alien is an interruption of residence if the attempt to come back to the United States was to accomplish some object which is itself contrary to some policy reflected in our immigration laws. Fleuti v. Rosenberg. 374 U.S 449 (1963). (2) Where the issue of whether an absence has been "meaningfully interruptive" within Fleuti v. Rosenberg,
374 U.S. 449
(1963), has already been determined against the applicant as the result of a criminal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jesus Aguilera-Enriquez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- United States Ex Rel. Freddie M. Johnson v. Robert L. Johnson, Superintendent, Appeal of the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Petition of Edmond K. Palatian v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Felipe Cuevas-Cuevas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Emma Altamirano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Morhay Tapucu v. Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- TIWARIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
- DUARTEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
- Emma Altamirano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.