Legal Opinion · Dissent

R. D. Wood Company v. Phoenix Steel Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 7, 1964No. 14334Published

1DissentMcLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge

I dissent from the decision of the court. That the decision and my position be clear, it is necessary to identify the parties and recite the facts and the course of the litigation:

Chester Blast Furnace, Inc., now the appellant, Phoenix Steel Corporation, contracted to sell certain pig iron to Florence Pipe Foundry and Machine Company, now the appellee, R. D. Wood Company, to be delivered F.O.B. Chester, Pennsylvania. Florence then entered into a charter party with S. C. Loveland Co., Inc. for the transport of this pig iron on the barge Fell Loveland. On March 11, 1955, after Chester completed…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API