Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raniel Bonifacio AMPARO, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1995No. 94-10542PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Raniel Bonifacio Amparo appeals from his jury convictions on federal firearms charges. On appeal he argues that the district court erred by instructing the jury that as a matter of law possession of an unregistered sawed-off shotgun is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B). We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

An undercover ATF agent arrested Amparo after feigning purchase of a sawed-off shotgun from him. At the time of his arrest, Amparo was carrying a loaded pistol. The shotgun was disassembled but operable when assembled.

Amparo was indicted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. Kevin J. SherbondyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. United States v. Joseph SimmsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. United States v. Larry T. TarwaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Klimavicius-ViloriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API