Legal Opinion

Hoffmann v. City of Syracuse

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDel Vecchio, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The action is by a retail liquor store operator and the Central New York Liquor Dealers’ Association, Inc., for a judgment declaring that the City of Syracuse retail sales tax is inapplicable to sales of alcoholic beverages in sealed packages for off-premises consumption or, in the alternative, that the tax is to *585be computed only on the retail price of bottled liquor less Federal and State excise taxes included therein.

An action for declaratory judgment is a proper…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Lash's Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Brainard v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Nock v. Coca Cola Bot. Wks. Pgh.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoffman v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API