Hussein v. State
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Read, J. (dissenting).
Granted, this appeal may not be conventionally moot or unripe. But then, plaintiffs’ claims are not justiciable in the orthodox sense either (see Board of Educ., Levittown Union Free School Dist. v Nyquist, 57 NY2d 27, 48 [1982] [indicating the constitutional standard would be unmet only in the case “possibly, of gross and glaring inadequacy,” which cannot be said to exist in New York where “the average per pupil expenditure exceeds that in all other States but two”];1 Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, *910341-342 [1995, Simons, J., dissenting]…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Board of Education v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- New York Civil Liberties Union v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Nebraska Coalition for Educational Equity & Adequacy v. HeinemanNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.