Legal Opinion · Dissent

Salt Lake City v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 10, 2005No. 20040942-CAPublished

1DissentThorne, Judge

[ 32 The majority's analysis of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) is both insightful and, I believe, largely correct.1 The majority correctly concludes that whether an out-of-court communication is "testimonial" depends on the cireumstances surrounding the communication. Up to that point, I join with the majority opinion. However, I part ways with the majority when, after acknowledging that the question is factual in nature, it decides whether the communication in this case is testimonial instead of remanding the question to the trial court for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. American Fork City v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API