Legal Opinion
Imperato v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUST. OF TENAFLY
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 30, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
91 N.J. Super. 540 (1966)
221 A.2d 751
LOUIS GEORGE IMPERATO, JR. AND ROBERT SCHWARZ, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF TENAFLY, NEW JERSEY, GEORGE LEVITIN, ORLANDO MINETTO, JR. AND HAROLD J. ANTHONY, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF TENAFLY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 25, 1966.
Decided June 30, 1966.
Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.
Mr. Lawrence G. Goodman argued the cause for appellants George Levitin and Orlando Minetto, Jr. (Messrs. Goodman & O'Dea, attorneys).
Mr. Marvin H.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Popular Refreshments, Inc. v. Fuller's Milk BarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Bierce v. GrossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Smilow v. City of Orange Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Graves v. Bloomfield Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Martel v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Mac Lean v. Planning Bd. of Brick Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Robinson v. BD. ADJ., CAPE MAYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974