Legal Opinion

United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Steele

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1993No. 21A01-9302-CV-49PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Are clauses in automobile insurance policies that exclude coverage for bodily injury to a spouse who resides in the same household as the insured, contrary to public policy? The trial court held that household exclusion clauses contravene public policy implicit in Indiana’s current Guest Statute, IND.CODE 34-4-40-3, and former Financial Responsibility Law, IND.CODE 9-1-4-3.5. 1 Therefore, the trial court entered partial summary judgment for the appel-lees-defendants, Estate of Lois Koors and Estate of Jeffrey Koors. The appellant-plaintiff United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. BolesIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Van Orman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Walker v. RinckIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. St. Anthony Medical Center, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HanleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Foster v. Evergreen Healthcare, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Rush v. Elkhart County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Samm v. Great Dane TrailersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API