Legal Opinion

Gosnell v. Leibman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 12, 1932No. [No. 2, April Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

This appeal is from a decree for specific performance of an agreement by appellant to purchase from appellees a lot of ground in Baltimore City, title to which was derived by appellee Anna Lacey Leibman under the will of her former husband, Anderson B. Lacey.

The contention of appellant is that Mrs. Leibman- did not take under the will a fee simple estate. The will, so far as it is pertinent to the present inquiry, is as follows:

“I give, devise and bequeath to my wife, Anna W. Lacey my entire estate, real and personal, said estate consisting, at this time, mainly of my Eorestglen Park…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  2. Payne v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  3. Nunn v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  4. Schlotzhauer v. KummerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gallaudet University v. National Society of the Daughters of the American RevolutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Boutelle v. BoutelleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API