Legal Opinion

Fortune v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 23, 1984No. 115-83TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

In this tax case, plaintiff, appearing pro se, claims that changes in the tax law which served to reduce the amount of disability income he could exclude from gross income discriminated against him.. Accordingly, his *671complaint, as amended, challenges a determination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) relative to plaintiff’s 1977 federal income tax return, which increased plaintiff’s tax liability for 1977 by $788.16. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment to which plaintiff has responded. For reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. Maryland Savings-Share Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Nicholas Picchione v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  4. De Mars v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael J. Mostowy and Josephine Mostowy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Mostowy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Buerer v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API