Legal Opinion

Drainage District No. 2 v. O'Neill

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1922No. 22194PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Redick, District Judge.

This is an action brought upon four separate and distinct bonds given in an injunction action brought against the drainage district by Henry W. O’Neill, Cornelius K. Heffernan, and Elizabeth Leahy, to enjoin the construction of an irrigation ditch across the lands of the plaintiff. The bonds are briefly described as follows: One *553for' $1,000 given upon the issuance of a temporary injunction and conditioned for the. payment of all damages sustained by the defendant in case it should finally ibe determined that the injunction ought not to have been granted; one for $4,000,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Trester v. PikeNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Raapke & Katz Co. v. Schmoller & Mueller Piano Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Radcliffe v. LaveryNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Fuchs v. Parsons Construction CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Sickler v. City of Broken BowNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Ravenna Bank v. Custom UnlimitedNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Brownell v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API