Legal Opinion

Crown Pontiac, Inc. v. Bell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 1989No. 88-03486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Crown Pontiac, Inc., appeals the trial court’s order which granted Crown’s own motion for a new trial. Because Crown requested this order and is not aggrieved by the order, we dismiss this appeal.

Randy and Maria Bell filed suit against Crown seeking rescission of a used car sales contract, as well as compensatory and punitive damages. They based their requests for relief upon breach of implied warranty and fraud. The Bells purchased from Crown a used 1984 Trans Am. Crown represented the car to the Bells as a “dealer’s demonstration” model which had been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hill v. American Medical Affiliates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Polk County v. SofkaSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. DavyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles/Division of Risk Management v. RomanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API