Legal Opinion
North River Ins. v. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1935No. 7820PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Guy H. Clark, as receiver of the Montborne Lumber Company, brought this action to recover on a fire insurance policy issued by the appellant to the Montborne Lumber Company. The facts were stipulated and the case was tried by the court without a jury. The lumber company operated a short logging railway. It owned a Shay locomotive covered by the policy which it alleged was “damaged by fire and by the collapse of bridges resulting from such fire to the amount of $15,000.” The stipulated facts showed that the locomotive was untouched and undamaged by the fire, but that it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ermentrout v. Girard Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- ætna Ins. Co. v. Houston Oil & Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Ætna Ins. v. Sacramento-Stockton S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Schambs v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Batts v. . SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aetna Insurance Company v. Getchell Steel Treating Company, Inc., Commercial Union Assurance Company, Ltd. v. H & L CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Camden F.I. Assn. v. N.B v. Hotel Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946
- McPherrin v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1942