Legal Opinion

Doty v. Jamieson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1932No. 41294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

The appellant brought suit on a promissory note. The appellee admitted the execution of the said note, and by way of counterclaim pleaded in effect that he had been employed by the appellant, individually and personally, to render certain services before the Internal Revenue Department of the United States Government at Washington in securing a refund of certain taxes that had been paid by a corporation in which the appellant was the owner of the majority of the stock. A reply was filed pleading the statute of limitations and alleging that said contract pleaded by the appellee in his answer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jelsma v. EnglishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Utseth v. Pratt-Mallory Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Grimes Savings Bank v. TolliverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westergard v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  2. Westergard v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API