Legal Opinion

Reading International, Inc. v. the Malulani Group, Limited

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 25, 2016No. 14-16827PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellee The Malulani Group, Limited (“TMG”) moves to disqualify counsel for appellant Reading International, Inc. (“Reading”), Bronster Fujichaku Robbins (“Bronster Firm”). TMG seeks disqualification because attorney Kenneth Robbins, a partner at the Bronster Firm, previously represented TMG while a partner at the firm Robbins & Associates.

We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We grant the motion to disqualify counsel. We express no opinion on the merits of the pending appeal.

The pending appeal challenges the district court’s judgment in favor of TMG in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Highley v. RothmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. In Re: County Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Otaka, Inc. v. KleinHawaii Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. (PS) Amazon.com, Inc. v. Pionera Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. (PS)At Home Electric v. The HartfordDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (PS)At Home Electric v. The HartfordDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Acuity A Mutual Insurance Company v. NAB, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  5. Acuity A Mutual Insurance Company v. NAB, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API