Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 2010PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant Isham Moore failed to establish that his attorney provided ineffective assistance because of her failure to request a justification charge. There are sound strategic reasons for counsel’s decision not to request such a charge. And even if this were not the case, defendant cannot show that he was entitled to a justification charge under any favorable interpretation of the testimony presented at trial.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of…

2Cited by94 opinions

  1. People v. BecoatsNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. ShogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. ShepherdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. MattisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. LancasterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API