Legal Opinion
Baranchik v. Fizulich
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 2017No. B268133PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
In 2008, defendants and respondents Redondo Beach Police Officers Mario Fizulich, Phillip Ho, and Ellen Tumbocon interacted with plaintiffs and appellants Phillip Baranchik and Eric Baranchik. The details of the interaction and subsequent arrests and criminal prosecutions are more fully described later in this opinion. Based on the interaction, Phillip, Eric, and Tiffeney Pyle 3 filed a federal civil action asserting claims for violation of their constitutional rights under 42 United States Code section 1983, including excessive force, false arrest, and malicious…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Smith v. City of HemetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gabriel Moran v. the Screening ProsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Skulason v. Cal. Bureau of Real Estate, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Gabriel Moran v. the Screening ProsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Garcia-Brower v. Premier Automotive Imports of CA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Maldonado v. BoudreauxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.