Legal Opinion · Dissent

Red Hook/Gowanus Chamber of Commerce v. New York City Board of Standards

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2005Published

1DissentG.B. Smith, J.

CPLR 1001 (b) is a provision that allows judges the discretion to permit litigation to continue without a necessary party, over whom the court lacks jurisdiction, if “justice [so] requires.” As the majority says, this statute should not be used except in “rare cases” to “circumvent the balance struck, and protections offered, by the statute of limitations” (majority op at 460). It is clear, as a matter of law, that this is not one of those “rare cases.” The allowed lapse of a statute of limitations by a party that offers no good excuse does not outweigh the prejudice to the missing necessary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Manupella v. Troy City Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Mount Pleasant Cottage School Union Free School District v. SobolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Mount Pleasant Cottage School Union Free School District v. SobolNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API