Schoenborn v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Diane L. Schoenborn and respondent State Farm Automobile Insurance Company are parties to an insurance contract providing both uninsured and underin-sured motorist benefits. The insurance contract provides that disputes involving uninsured motorist benefits may be submitted to arbitration; but it is silent on the resolution of disputes involving underin-sured motorist benefits. Schoenborn brought a motion to compel arbitration of a claim for underinsured motorist benefits. She argued that the 1986 version of the No-Fault Act, applicable to the case at hand,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Itt Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance Company v. Amerishare Investors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- ITT Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance v. Amerishare Investors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998