United States Cartridge Co. v. Powell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COLLET, Circuit Judge.
In our original opinion, 185 F.2d 67, when we considered appellant’s contention relating to Section 2 of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 252, we assumed that appellant was 'basing its argument that recovery could not be had for the periods of time involved upon the proposition alone that the proof presented was inadequate to support a recovery for payment for such periods of time. It was upon that assumption that we denied appellant’s contention and held that the evidence w¡is sufficient to support a finding that the periods of time in question were compensable…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Battaglia v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Bonner v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- United States Cartridge Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by3 opinions
- Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Ciemnoczolowski v. Q. O. Ordnance Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1954
- Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973