Legal Opinion

Swenson v. Kiehl

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Davis District Court. Injunction brought by Swenson to restrain the sale by Kiehl, as sheriff of Davis county, mf eighty acres of land, claimed by the plaintiff as her homestead. At the November Term, 1877, of the district court, the defendant Kiehl had judgment against Swenson, who brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action of injunction to restrain the sale by defendant, as sheriff of Davis county, of eighty acres claimed by the plaintiff as her homestead. 1 There was a general finding and judgment in favor of defendant, and plaintiff alleges error. The petition to restrain the sale was filed May 28th, 1877, and the trial had November 30th, 1877. The judgment upon which the execution was issued was rendered in 1873.' One execution was issued February 5,1877, and another, April 23d, 1877. Both were levied upon the land, and under the latter…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bank of Kansas v. DavisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Stowell v. KerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Davis v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Brokken v. BaumannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Ingels v. IngelsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API