Legal Opinion

United States v. Ortlieb

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 27, 2001No. 00-30895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHELL, District Judge:

Appellant Michael S. Fawer appeals his conviction and sentence after- having been found guilty on each of three charges, or specifications, of criminal contempt in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 401(1). Fawer contends that the evidence was insufficient to support each specification of contempt, that the district judge erred in not recus-ing himself from hearing Specification No. 5, and that the sentence he received, consisting of both a fine and suspension from the practice of law in the Middle District of Louisiana for one year, was not authorized under the law. For…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. United States v. Bobby G. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. In the Matter of David DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baum v. Blue Moon Ventures, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Jorge Silva-De HoyosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. Amalia Pena v. Lone Star National Bank, N.A., et aCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. Hayes v. Skywest AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API