Legal Opinion

Manion v. Sarcione

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 2001No. CIV.A. 01-2765PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BARTLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff has brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Anthony Sarcione, the District Attorney of Chester County, and Joseph Daniels (“Daniels”), a Chester County detective. Included in the complaint are various supplemental state law claims. 1 Before the court is the motion of defendants to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendants also assert absolute and qualified immunity.

We accept as true the well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint and draw in plaintiffs favor any reasonable…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DOE v. HILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  2. DOE v. HILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  3. RAZZANO v. SARANDREADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL TRISTIAN PAONE, BY AND THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE, MICHAEL PAONE, JR. AND LISA PAONE v. PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API