Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Follett

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1904No. 2383Published

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

February 11, 1898, The First National Bank of Denver, plaintiff in error, commenced suit in attachment against • A. L. Deane & Co., a co-partnership consisting of A. L. Deane and J. W. Donnell, *374doing business in Chicago and Denver, and caused a writ of attachment to be levied upon a stock of goods in the store premises, 503 Sixteenth street, Denver, Colorado'.

Mrs. Follett, defendant in error, filed a petition in intervention, averring, that at the time of the levy of the writ, of attachment she was the owner and in possession of the goods levied upon.

The answer to the petition in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Prewit v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Graeff v. HitchmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  3. Riethmann v. GodsmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Seeleman v. HoaglandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  5. Smith v. JensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API