State v. Renfro
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentDore, J.
(dissenting) — Because the results from lie detector tests have not been shown to be reliable, and possess a high potential for prejudice, they are generally inadmissible. See Annot., 53 A.L.R.3d 1005 (1973). Stipulations neither make the process more accurate nor eliminate the danger of the usurpation of the jury's fact-finding role. I would, therefore, hold that the court erred in admitting the polygraph evidence over the defendant's objection. Furthermore, the error was magnified by the court's failure to protect the defendant's right to a fair trial by properly cautioning the jury as to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- United States v. Steven John AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- State v. BiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.