Legal Opinion

Linscott Supply Co. v. Hopewell

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 13, 1914No. 1033PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts; Frederic Dodge, Judge. Suit in equity by Charles F. Hopewell against the Linscott Supply Company. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

The Hopewell and Kinder patents at issue relate to a case, or cover, designed for the protection of spare tires carried on automobiles. The Hopewell patent is numbered 854,-215, and the Kinder patent is numbered 881,411.

The case, or cover, is described as one which shall twice overlap the tread-face of the tire and one side-thereof. The purpose of the cover in question is to protect the tire against water and dirt, and the claims, speaking generally, cover an annular tire case adapted to overlap.

It is said in the specification of the Hopewell patent:

“It will be noticed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. Howland Falls Pulp Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1897
  3. Andrews v. ThumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marlboro Wire Goods Co. v. Home Accessories Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
  2. Terkelsen Mach. Co. v. Pierce Wrapping Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
  3. In re Walker Grain Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1925
  4. Knight v. Union Hardware Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API