Legal Opinion

Maro Hosiery Corp. v. Hann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 13, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 9, 1977, granting attachment against the property of defendant Caren Hann, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The complaint and the supporting papers indicate a sufficiently meritorious claim against Bernard Hann, husband of appellant Caren Hann, for damages for commercial bribery, breach of duty of loyalty, and misconduct as an officer and employee of plaintiff, Maro Hosiery Corp. An order of attachment was granted against the husband Bernard Hann and the validity of that order is not now before us. The present…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Capehart Corp. v. Shanghai Commercial Bank, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. J. United Electrical Contracting Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  3. Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API