Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ingram v. Luther

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 4, 1968No. 5-4331Published

1Concurrence

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

I respectfully dissent. In order to consider the case in proper perspective, I will from time to time call attention to certain premises of the majority opinion that I do not feel to be justified.

First, there are statements indicating that the first case was consolidated with the second case, without objection by the appellant. The record in the first case was offered in evidence as was appropriate in a proceeding to attack the decree therein, but there was in no sense any consolidation of the actions, or of the records.

It is clear that the original proceeding was an…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Boyce's Executors v. GrundySupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Boynton v. AshabrannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Hendrickson v. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Cassady v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API