Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hillsdale County Telephone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1912No. Docket No. 12PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Hillsdale; Chester, J. Bill by Perry D. Moore and others against the Hillsdale County Telephone Company and others for an accounting. From a decree for defendants, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The Waldron Telephone Exchange appears to have originally been a neighborhood arrangement. I find no material contradiction of testimony fpr complainants here set out:

“Mr. J. M. Barnes and myself were the originators of it. We thought it a good thing to have an exchange among ourselves in the village, and went around and got all together into it that would, with the understanding that each one would share pro rata with the expenses. We bought material and divided the cost amongst us. I think there were 15 of the original starters of the phone. We estimated the probable cost, and they each…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berger v. MeadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Swan v. IspasMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pawley v. GlasscockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Posner v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Bosteder v. DulingNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API